Used BMW I3 Review
When Nissan jump-started the EV market with the launch of its Leaf in 2010, it caused a lot of excitement. The Leaf was, after all, the first mainstream production vehicle that was designed, from the outset, to run on electricity rather than fossil fuels. Almost a decade on, many EVs are still developed from cars conceived to be powered by conventional engines, but one of the more radical clean-sheet designs was the BMW i3, launched with a choice of pure- electric or range-extender powertrains. BMW has since given up on the latter, leaving only the all-electric i3 for new-car buyers - but does a used i3 of either kind make sense? 鈥?BMW i3 Mk1 (2013-date) - Futuristic premium four-seat EV is frugal and good to drive. It鈥檚 not cheap, though. The latter version has a 650cc, motobike-derived, two-cylinder petrol engine, fuelled from a nine-litre tank. This unit only ever acts as a generator to charge the batteries; it never drives the wheels directly. A 94Ah battery pack (33kWh) was fitted from July 2016, then a refreshed i3 was introduced in August 2017 with 181bhp (previously 168bhp), alongside a sportier i3 S option, more hi-tech kit and tweaked styling.
Which one should I buy? While the i3 range extender is more usable than the pure EV, you鈥檒l pay a premium for one. But now that the range extender is no longer available from new, these models are likely to hold their value better than the electric-only versions, because there鈥檚 a demand for them on the used market. Both the i3 EV and REx initially came with only one trim level, and a choice of four finishes: Standard (black/dark grey), Loft (light/mid grey), Lodge (tan/mid-grey) and Suite (dark brown). Standard equipment on all versions included cruise control, 19-inch alloys, heated front seats, climate control, a multifunction steering wheel, DAB radio and navigation. The i3 S offered an extra 13bhp, 20-inch wheels, sport suspension and sportier trim details. Competitors for the i3 include the Nissan Leaf and Renault ZOE in terms of size, but neither of these can match the BMW鈥檚 unique, high-quality feel. A ZOE costs around half as much, so in some ways this actually makes it more impressive. A Volkswagen e-Golf feels like a premium product and is great to drive, but it seems somewhat ordinary, because it wasn鈥檛 designed from the outset as an EV.
With some electric vehicles you must lease the battery pack each month, but the i3鈥檚 battery is bought outright with the car. As standard the i3 only came with a trickle-charge option; faster chargers were available for those willing to spend a bit more cash. The i3鈥檚 carbon-fibre construction means that even minor damage to the bodywork or chassis can be a major deal to put right. The leather trim used in the cabin doesn鈥檛 seem to wear as well as the cloth version, and it also gets easily stained by black jeans. Inside the i3 looks as hi-tech as it does on the outside and, thanks to the trendy rear-hinged back doors, getting in and out of the car is easy. There鈥檚 only room (and seatbelts) for four people, though, which may be a hindrance at times. The modern dash is a bit daunting at first, but you soon get used to it because it鈥檚 highly intuitive.
The boot is quite small at 260 litres, or 1,100 with the seats folded. You can buy a nearly new Mk1 BMW i3 for between 拢13,950 and 拢41,855 on our sister site BuyaCar. Thanks to the electric i3鈥檚 simplicity, only the brakes generally need attention, but its heating system contains long-life coolant. The i3 REx has two cooling systems (for the heater and engine) and its chain-driven engine needs an oil and filter change every two years or 12,000 miles, at a cost of 拢211. Owners who purchased a 拢239 Service Inclusive pack got three years of check-ups, but the plan could only be bought up to the first service and can鈥檛 be extended. The i3 has been recalled once so far, due to incorrectly calibrated sensors within the electric power steering system. These weren鈥檛 set up properly at the point of manufacture, so the driver was in danger of losing control when cornering. The fix only required a recalibration of the sensors. They rate it slightly lower than we do (3.7/5 compared with 3.9/5), with overall ratings skewed somewhat by two owners who have experienced lots of problems. Still, most drivers love the performance, build quality, reliability and usability.
