Showing posts with label Glendal's Favorite Reviews. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Glendal's Favorite Reviews. Show all posts

Wednesday, December 23, 2020

Glendal's Favorite Reviews

Glendal's Favorite Reviews





This means the car is now square in the sights of the hot hatch that鈥檚 left a trail of fast family five-doors in its wake: the Ford Focus RS. Both models use four-cylinder turbos and six-speed manual gearboxes, making them two of the most overtly sporty cars on sale today; just look at their muscular styling and aggressive stances. There鈥檚 only 拢730 difference between these two challengers鈥?list prices, too. However, one major point divides them: while the newcomer from Honda is front-wheel drive, the Ford is four-wheel drive. These cars cater for the same market and offer hardcore driving thrills alongside enough practicality to make them usable day-to-day propositions. But which has the broader range of ability to take the honours as our hot-hatch champion? The previous Civic Type R was on sale for only two years before Honda went back to the drawing board and came up with this new, ultra-hot version of the 10th-generation Civic. The latest car comes in two flavours: standard and the 拢32,995 GT we鈥檙e testing here, which gets more equipment. VTEC works alongside the turbo here to boost low-end performance, and there鈥檚 plenty of muscle on offer.





While the 400Nm of torque is some way down on the Ford鈥檚 470Nm on overboost, the Civic weighs only 1,380kg next to the 1,524kg Focus RS. Despite a limited-slip diff, the Type R struggles for traction off the line, covering 0-60mph in six seconds flat on test. But this was still a second slower than the more powerful, four-wheel-drive Ford, which has launch control to manage slip from a standstill. The cars are much more evenly matched once the wheels are turning, however. On test, 30-70mph took 4.3 seconds in both models, and the Honda was two-tenths faster from 30-50mph in third gear than the Ford, taking only 2.2 seconds. The Civic also hit the rev limiter in second just before 60mph, so the figures don鈥檛 tell the whole story. In-gear performance is exhilarating, with a wonderful blast of torque through the mid-range that gives a greater sensation of speed than the Ford鈥檚 more linear power delivery. Where the Honda really takes off is with its breadth of ability. R on track. Both of these settings sharpen up the Honda into something truly special; the steering is precise and there鈥檚 an incredible amount of grip through bends.





While the Ford is great fun, mastering the Civic鈥檚 razor-sharp chassis will engage and delight drivers even more. Fast Hondas are also known for their gearchange action, and this one is no exception to the rule. It has a short, mechanical shift, with a superb position in the cabin that adds a sense of fun to any journey. Testers鈥?notes: 鈥淵ou wouldn鈥檛 call the Civic attractive, but its pugnacious stance is backed up by a genuinely brilliant drive. The Ford Focus RS boasts more power than the Honda and is slightly cheaper, but how a car feels and how usable it is can be as important as outright firepower with models such as these. So does the 拢32,265 Focus RS have what it takes to overcome the Civic Type R鈥檚 challenge? That overboost function allows the Focus to boast brawnier figures than the Civic. But the extra weight means that, in reality, on the road there鈥檚 not much difference in performance. At our track the launch control and four-wheel drive meant the Ford was quicker off the line from 0-60mph, taking 5.0 seconds. This was untouchable for the Honda, yet there鈥檚 more to this battle than straight-line speed.





The extra torque gives the Focus strong in-gear performance, accelerating on test from 50 to 70mph in sixth in 4.6 seconds - 1.2 seconds faster than the Civic. In fifth, the same test took the Ford 3.7 seconds and the Honda 3.8 seconds, just a tenth behind. The Focus was much faster off the line, though, thanks to that four-wheel-drive grip. Despite the RS鈥檚 speed, the Civic is the sweeter car to drive, with nicer steering and incredible grip in fast corners. The Ford鈥檚 six-speed manual box is also lighter and not quite as mechanically precise as the Honda鈥檚. It鈥檚 this interaction with the car that defines the experience. The clever Drift mode kicks the tail out into an arc in corners and gives the Ford an advantage over the Honda here, but it feels like it鈥檚 fighting what the car fundamentally wants to do. You鈥檒l have to find yourself a track just to use it. Still, the traction on offer is excellent, helping turn the car a little more from the rear and boosting agility. The RS is always raring to go.





It鈥檚 firm in the standard mode, with hyper-alert steering, while initiating the RS mode for the dampers will have you pogoing up and down in your seat; the chassis is very firm. There is no doubt this hatch has the hot element covered, but it doesn鈥檛 have the breadth of ability of the Civic. Testers鈥?notes: 鈥淭he RS was developed with help from rally driver and YouTube sensation Ken Block. The Focus RS is even more pumped up than its ST stablemate, with its huge grille and roof spoiler. But the Honda takes things to another level with its outlandish wheelarches, racy bodykit and massive wing. It makes the Ford look toned down when you put the two together like this. Each of these hot hatches offers ballistic straight-line performance, but they鈥檙e also fantastic at scrubbing off speed. The Ford鈥檚 brakes are very strong and inspire confidence, but the Honda鈥檚 seem even sharper and the pedal gives plenty of feel.

Wednesday, December 9, 2020

Glendal's Favorite Reviews

Glendal's Favorite Reviews





Volkswagen has unveiled a second concept at this year鈥檚 New York Motor Show, called the Atlas Tanoak, previewing a potential pick-up version of the new Atlas SUV. Named after a tree native to the Pacific Coast in the U.S. 5,438mm long - that鈥檚 over 400mm longer than the seven-seat Atlas. It鈥檚 based on the same MBQ platform and powered by a 276bhp 3.6-litre V6, which drives through all four wheels and an eight-speed automatic gearbox. VW says 0-62mph takes 8.5 seconds. The design of the Atlas Tanoak is separate from the Atlas SUV on which it鈥檚 based, with only slight similarities between the two cars. The Atlas Tanoak has a more rugged appearance to match its off-road capabilities with a raised bonnet and rugged underbody protection, which houses a centrally mounted winch and carabiner. The grille and VW badge are luminated by white light and offer an animated lighting display when the car is unlocked with light running over the grille and into the LED headlight surrounds, while the badge gradually gets brighter.





New distinctive six-sided LED daytime running lights are a prominent feature at the front, too. The rear features a low hinged tailgate, which when opened gives a cargo bed of 2,291mm. Like the front, the Atlas logo has been integrated into the tailgate, which features wraparound animated lighting. Red LED strips on the upper and lower parts of the tailgate move to create three dimensional taillights either side. The lower rear of the vehicle has been designed as both an underbody shield and a diffuser, while a towhook sits above the exhaust. Inside, the Atlas Tanoak looks production ready. Sporty, contoured seats are used up front to offer support when off-roading while the passengers in the rear are treated to individual seats. The centre console, steering wheel and instruments have been heavily redesigned from the Atlas SUV. Most of the functions, including air conditioning, are now operated digitally via the touchscreen, which sits high on the dashboard for ease of use. Together with the Volkswagen Digital Cockpit, which sits in front of the driver, it forms a digitalized cockpit environment.





As I mentioned in a previous, blog German Automotive Technology is really, really cool. German car design and automotive technology is currently at the forefront of going green, with the result that all other motor manufacturers are turning green with envy. Pardon the pun. German car design technology doesn't flaunt the colour green as eco-friendly but rather blue. Mercedes is pushing Blue Efficiency as their future technology and VW is flaunting Bluemotion as their new technology. Polo de Volkswagen Bluemotion technology started out with the 2007 Polo (not my 2007 Polo Classic) and may be seen in some of their new vehicles. It's futuristic in the sense that it saves fuel. It saves all the fuel that would have been used, if the car was allowed to idle. Blue Efficiency and Bluemotion fuel technology doesn't allow the car's engine to idle, so when you start the car, it doesn't actually idle but the dashboard lights indicate that the engine has started. Logically there is no engine noise since there are no revs.





The moment the car is engaged into gear and you remove your foot from the brake pedal, the engine starts instantly and pulls away as if it has been idling all the time. Exactly the same happens when coming to a compete stop at a traffic light or stop street. The engine switches off when the car comes to a halt, and remains off whiles you foot keeps the brake pedal depressed. However, the moment the pedal is released, the engine starts and the car moves off as if the engine was never switched off. There is no delay. Currently service agents are trowing spare parts at each electronic problem hoping that it would solve the problem but in most cases doesn't solve the problem. Below is a picture of a potentiometer marked "A" that may be used in an electronic circuit. It specific one could be used as a volume control in an amplifier, or a sensitivity control on a disco strobe or a brightness control for a lamp dimmer. The uses for potentiometers are endless and has been used in cars for quite some time. An overview of the Electronic Power Control Circuit - EPC in Volkswagen, Audi, Skoda.

Sunday, November 22, 2020

Glendal's Favorite Reviews

Glendal's Favorite Reviews





The automotive industry is changing faster now than it has for decades. More people are waking up to the virtues of plug-in hybrid vehicles, so manufacturers are ramping up investment in the technology. MINI is the latest car maker to surf that wave. It combines low running costs with decent performance in a practical off-roader body, but it has a tough job on its hands going up against our favourite plug-in hybrid family car, the Volkswagen Golf GTE. The VW may not possess the MINI鈥檚 rugged looks, but it has quality, sharp handling and efficiency. However, both will have to overcome the challenge from Britain鈥檚 favourite plug-in hybrid, the Mitsubishi Outlander PHEV. The Japanese car is a bigger SUV than the MINI and a completely different body style from the Golf, but all three cars claim to offer practicality and parsimonious running costs. Which is the most convincing? The Countryman S E is MINI鈥檚 first plug-in hybrid. With a 134bhp 1.5-litre three-cylinder petrol engine mated to an 87bhp electric motor, the 拢29,075 S E ALL4 offers surprising pace, all-wheel drive and impressive claims of up to 134.5mpg. Can it deliver on its on-paper promises?





The Countryman S E might be heavier than conventionally powered models, but it retains that sense of fun that has been a MINI trait for years. Still, that 1,735kg kerbweight means the MINI isn鈥檛 as agile as the Golf. The steering is quick and with plenty of grip turn-in is positive - plus the electric four-wheel-drive system gives good traction and you can feel the subtle boost from the motor under full throttle. On test the Countryman served up an impressive 0-60mph time, taking just 6.4 seconds to cover the sprint. It鈥檚 helped by the automatic transmission that shifts smoothly and contributes to the overall relaxing experience on the move. In gear, the instant torque from the electric motor gave excellent response as the MINI accelerated between 30 and 50mph in fourth in 3.1 seconds, while there鈥檚 plenty of urge to roll along in EV mode. You get some three-cylinder thrum from under the bonnet when the engine kicks in, but the car is relatively refined at speed.





However, the chassis has been stiffened to cope with the extra weight of the battery pack, so the Countryman doesn鈥檛 float over bumps with as much composure as the regular car. Push harder and the extra weight is noticeable through the looser body control as the dampers struggle to control the mass. It鈥檚 a fair match for the Golf, however, and is far more composed and fun than the Outlander. You can also tweak the drive modes for extra efficiency or a sportier feel; the latter adds weight to the steering, but the default mode is best. An area where the Countryman scores well is its brakes. Pedal feel on these regenerative set-ups can be vague, and although the MINI isn鈥檛 perfect, it鈥檚 one of the better ones we鈥檝e tested. Testers鈥?notes: 鈥淭he way the Countryman combines its petrol and electric propulsion is slick. Recently facelifted for 2017, the VW Golf remains the only car on sale in the United Kingdom offered with petrol, diesel, full electric and hybrid powertrains. Here we test the 拢29,635 plug-in hybrid Golf GTE in Advance form, which costs 拢560 more than the MINI but is 拢2,170 cheaper than the Outlander.





Can it convert that into victory? The GTE sits at the sportier end of the plug-in market, combining GTI performance with even lower running costs than the Golf GTD. However, it doesn鈥檛 drive with quite the same verve as those cars, but it鈥檚 closely matched with the MINI and more enjoyable than the Outlander. The suspension has been tweaked and is stiffer to cope with the weight of the battery pack mounted underneath the boot. To give an idea of how much this weighs, the GTE is 250kg heavier than a GTI. It doesn鈥檛 change direction as sharply as other Golfs as a result, but it鈥檚 more alert and agile than the MINI, helped by its lower centre of gravity, while the Outlander simply can鈥檛 compete. The GTE shares the Countryman鈥檚 accurate steering and while grip is good, the Golf sometimes does struggle for traction due to its front-wheel drive set-up. However, this is only when driving faster, and as the GTE has that capability, it鈥檚 more evident but certainly not a problem day to day.

Sunday, October 4, 2020

Glendal's Favorite Reviews

Glendal's Favorite Reviews





Over the years the Mercedes A-Class has morphed from what was an innovative rethink on the small MPV to a gawky also-ran, before a total redesign in 2012 turned it into a thoroughly competitive premium family hatchback. Now Mercedes has had another innovative rethink with the fourth-generation A-Class. The latest version takes its design inspiration from the firm鈥檚 new, high-end models such as the CLS, while the interior promises to offer a level of tech and quality pretty much unseen before in this sector. But this area of the market is packed with premium rivals that have proven their ability time and again. First up is the Volkswagen Golf, which has become the benchmark in this class over decades of evolution. In its current Mk7.5 form it delivers space, economy, quality and a great level of technology. Mercedes does battle across the board with Audi, and on paper that brand鈥檚 A3 Sportback is a package with which the A-Class is closely aligned and will have to beat.





Solid driving dynamics and cool tech mean the Audi provides a stern test. However, our winner will have to blend a long list of attributes, while the financial factor will also come into it. So let鈥檚 find out which car is the strongest offering. As is the way with the latest car in any class, there鈥檚 lots of new tech for this 2018 Mercedes A-Class. We鈥檙e testing the A 200 petrol in AMG Line trim, which starts at a fairly pricey 拢28,700 - but its rivals cost similar money, too, so can it beat them? The A-Class鈥檚 downsized engine boasts more power than its VW Group rivals, and on test it asserted its authority, taking the car from 0-60mph in 7.4 seconds, which was four tenths faster than the Volkswagen and the Audi. The power advantage came to the fore once more during our in-gear assessments, where the A 200 just shaded its competitors in most of the tests.





However, it was not by a such a margin that the A-Class had a discernable advantage on the road. But the engine does feel more strained than the 1.5 turbo units in its rivals, which is partly due to the drone it makes under load. The power delivery has a few noticeable steps lower down in the rev range, too, and isn鈥檛 as smooth as either the VW or Audi. That is also true of the ride. It鈥檚 not the most forgiving at low speed and despite that more sophisticated multi-link rear axle, the A-Class struggles to cope with faster, harsher imperfections, jiggling the body and, consequently, the occupants around inside. Things smooth out at higher speed and the Mercedes deals with rolling road surfaces well, but a big, jagged bump will still clatter up through the suspension. There鈥檚 a good degree of composure, though, and while the car feels benign it does inspire enough confidence thanks to its stability. Testers鈥?notes: All A-Classes have lowered sports suspension, so if you鈥檙e after more ride comfort than dynamic handling, think about the trim you choose.





In every sense the Volkswagen Golf is the car the A-Class has to beat. It鈥檚 our current favourite family hatchback and blends premium appeal with practicality and technology. At 拢26,980, this 1.5 TSI EVO DSG model in R-Line trim is the cheapest here. The powertrain is a known quantity, and at our test track it performed well, with a smooth swell of torque low down (250Nm to match the Mercedes, but produced lower down from 1,500rpm) that delivered decent acceleration. The transmission makes up for a slight lack of performance, too. With the powertrain shared with the A3, the VW and Audi鈥檚 dual-clutch boxes are more accomplished than the Mercedes鈥? They shift quicker in manual mode and are slightly smoother in auto, too. Thanks to our car鈥檚 拢850 Dynamic Chassis Control adaptive dampers, the Golf鈥檚 damping is as pliant and plush as ever, even on 拢500 optional 18-inch alloys. The larger wheels mean it thumps over potholes a little more, but the damping is still more forgiving at low speed than in the A-Class.

Tuesday, September 1, 2020

Glendal's Favorite Reviews

Glendal's Favorite Reviews





Volkswagen, Tesco and Pod Point are rolling out 2,400 electric vehicle (EV) charging bays to create what will be the UK鈥檚 largest retail network of EV chargers. By 2020, 600 Tesco Extra stores and Tesco Superstores across the country will offer fast or rapid charging, with Pod Point installing 7kW and 50kW EV chargers. Customers will be able charge their EVs for at the 7kW fast chargers or use the 50kW rapid charger in exchange for a fee that VW describes as 鈥渁 small cost in line with the market rate鈥? The charging bays will be open to EVs of all brands, but will feature VW branding as well as LCD screen that will display advertisements for a variety of companies, including the German manufacturer. Meanwhile, Tesco hopes the scheme will enable it to build on the commitment it made last year to run on 100 per cent renewable energy. VW currently offers two electric cars - the e-Golf and e-up! The German brand will start launching its I.D. EVs next year when order books open for the I.D. Golf-sized model to be followed from 2020 with the I.D. Buzz and I.D. Crozz. Pod Point CEO Eric Fairbairn said the agreement 鈥渞epresents a 14 per cent increase in the number of public charge bays in the UK鈥? What are your thoughts on this new charging point partnership?





Even the most celebrated and well-established of them all, the VW Golf GTI, can鈥檛 last for a whole model lifecycle without an extra-hardcore run-out special edition. We鈥檙e lucky it can鈥檛, or we鈥檇 have missed out on some utterly brilliant fast hatches over this car鈥檚 long and illustrious history. Emerging this time, as a farewell to the GTI Mk7.5, is an ode to the FIA鈥檚 now globally popular Touring Car Racing motorsport formula. The GTI TCR is also an attempt to keep VW鈥檚 evergreen hot hatch competitive. So, power jumps to 213kW and torque to 380Nm, courtesy of the EA888 2.0-litre turbo four pot that鈥檚 been updated with new software management, furnished with a couple of extra radiators, and made WLTP-emissions compliant. Sadly, like the garden-variety GTIs, the TCR only comes in DSG form - the same seven-speed dual-clutch used in the Mk7.5. The TCR gets VW鈥檚 electronic locking 鈥榚Diff鈥?as standard, but it adds sizable composite brake discs as well as forged 18-inch alloy wheels.





You can choose between two optional rolling chassis upgrade packs. The first adds forged 19-inch rims and beefed up adaptive dampers, the second a slightly different set of forged 19-inch rims, the same sports adaptive dampers and Michelin Pilot Sport Cup 2 tyres. Both upgrade packs see the car鈥檚 250km/h speed limiter removed. Final spec and pricing for Australia is yet to be confirmed. Outwardly, the TCR is probably best distinguished from the lesser GTI by its matte black alloy wheels, and the extended front splitter, rear diffuser and roof spoiler that make up its new TCR racer-inspired aero kit. Well, those and the car鈥檚 motorsport-tastic hexagonal side decals (which are effectively a no-cost option). You can add carbon-fibre door mirror caps, or you can opt for 鈥榩ure grey鈥?paint if you like, which is exclusive to the TCR. On the inside new microfibre-and-cloth sports seats appear, as does a modified steering wheel with perforated leather grips and a competition-style dead-centre marker in red.





The TCR鈥檚 driving position is near-perfect for a hot hatch. Its new sports seats are great and its interior fittings look and feel absolutely first class, showing few signs of age. However, most of that鈥檚 also true of a regular GTI and wouldn鈥檛 be a good enough reason for finding the extra cash. So what would be? Well, the TCR certainly delivers a dose more straight-line pace than the car on which it was based - the Clubsport S - though not a huge one. There is only 10Nm of extra torque on offer here over a GTI, which probably isn鈥檛 enough to notice in terms of mid-range thrust - although the TCR doesn鈥檛 feel short on the stuff. Where the car really delivers on its makeover is at high revs, and particularly so through the last 1500rpm of the operating rev range, when that freed-up 2.0-litre pulls with notably greater enthusiasm and venom.

Tuesday, August 18, 2020

Glendal's Favorite Reviews

Glendal's Favorite Reviews





With the roll-out of diesel bans and low emissions zones in urban environments across the globe, service industries are going to need zero-emissions delivery vehicles. And manufacturers are turning to their large vans to provide the solution. Hot on the heels of the Renault Master ZE and the forthcoming Mercedes eVito and eSprinter models, Volkswagen has launched the e-Crafter, an all-electric version of its largest van. The e-Crafter follows a similar template to its rivals, as it uses existing electric vehicle technology to produce a zero-emissions commercial vehicle for first-mile deliveries and other businesses that need to access locations within potential zero-emissions areas. But as the e-Crafter was developed at the same time as the diesel version, the Crafter platform has been optimised to accommodate its EV running gear. Under the skin, the e-Crafter uses the same 35.8kWh battery found in the VW e-Golf. Drive is supplied by a 134bhp electric motor that also has 290Nm of instant torque, while a single-speed gearbox drives the front wheels.





From the outside, our test model was marked out as the EV variant courtesy of its e-Crafter decals, but other than a few small blue badges, the standard e-Crafter is identical to a top-spec diesel Crafter in appearance. It's the same story in the cab, where the most obvious change is the replacement of the rev counter with the energy flow meter from the e-Golf. The e-Crafter starts with the same chime as the e-Golf, too, while a lack of a sound generator means the van pulls away making no noise at all - slightly unnerving if you're driving it in busy pedestrian areas. Thanks to the instant torque from its electric motor, the e-Crafter accelerates briskly, but it's limited to 90kmh (56mph), so is really at its best in urban areas. Lift off the throttle, and the e-Crafter loses speed gently like a manual van in gear, while the brake lights activate to warn other road users that you are slowing.





Unlike the Mercedes eSprinter, which has a harsher braking effect, there are no alternative modes, so if you want to freewheel in free-flowing traffic, that still requires you to add some throttle pedal to prevent the van losing speed. We tried e-Crafters with and without payloads, but the weight of the batteries under the load floor meant the ride was stable even when unladen, while the Crafter's surprisingly involving handling remained intact, too. Interestingly, the e-Crafter doesn't feature a battery-preserving Eco mode, so it's down to your own driving style to help you save energy. Of course, the crunch questions about the e-Crafter are about its operating range and price. VW claims that it has a range of 173 kilometres (107 miles) on a full charge, so you can expect a useable range of around 60 miles in everyday use. That places it firmly into the urban delivery zone, while VW offers all the usual functions such as pre-conditioning of the cabin and heated seats to help minimise battery use when on the move. Charging the battery from flat via the mains will take 17 hours, or just over five hours from a 7.2kW wallbox. The e-Crafter is compatible with the new CCS Combined Charging System as standard. This system allows the e-Crafter to be charged to 80 per cent capacity in 45 minutes, while the remaining 20 per cent can be topped up in another 20-30 minutes, depending on charging conditions. The e-Crafter goes on sale in Germany for 鈧?9,500 (拢63,000). While that's a fair amount of cash, it鈥檚 including sales tax and not considering regional discounts designed to promote EV use. And of course, the initial outlay is counterbalanced by the low running costs of an EV. Volkswagen has calculated that the e-Crafter uses 21.5kWh of energy per 100km when carrying a 975kg payload, which is equivalent to a 2.0 TDI diesel Crafter returning 135mpg with the same load on board.





The price isn't too high. However I don't see why you need to change the ECT sensor and thermostat at 80k. You should change the timing belt and coolant isn't a bad idea if you haven't done it in awhile. Changing the water pump at the same time as the timing belt has become a norm. But it depends if you've had any water pump issues or not. Napa,Checkers,Pepboys, places like that. For a dealership, that's about right. Are Volkswagen Jettas cool cars? I bought a 2000 VW Jetta bout 2 years ago. Runs good and was kept in great condition. Im 18 now and I am curious as to what other people think about Jettas. Do other people think that they look cool? Are they attractive in any way? German car at 18 is cool in itself. Jettas are very well liked cars in general. VW Jettas are the best, my wife and I have owned 3 Jettas they have always been the best choice. Cool and reliable car.





VW had been a laggard on electrification until it admitted in 2015 to cheating on U.S. Chinese quotas for EVs and tightening regulation in Europe. This prompted a strategic shift to zero-emission and self-driving technology, and VW has one of the most ambitious programmes in the industry. VW said earnings were driven by a growing share of sales of higher-margin models such as the redesigned Tiguan SUV and the Arteon fastback and increasing savings from VW's modular platforms. The carmaker forecast 2018 group sales to exceed moderately last year's record of 10.7 million vehicles. Group sales jumped 10 percent in January with demand up in all major world regions, showing that the emissions scandal has not dented VW's popularity among consumers. The company faced a new diesel scandal last month when it emerged that VW and other German carmakers had sponsored diesel fume tests involving monkeys and humans. Separately, management and the supervisory board on Friday proposed to raise the dividend for 2017 to 3.90 euros per common share and to 3.96 euros per preference share, from 2.00 euros and 2.06 euros respectively for the previous.

Saturday, July 25, 2020

Glendal's Favorite Reviews

Glendal's Favorite Reviews





Drivers of badly rusted cars have up to a 20 per cent higher chance of dying in an accident, according to the world鈥檚 first used car crash test conducted under Euro NCAP criteria. A fifth-generation Volkswagen Golf and a first-generation Mazda 6 were tested by the UK鈥檚 crash test agency, Thatcham Research, on behalf of the Swedish Homeowners Association and the Swedish insurer, Folksam. The results revealed that significant chassis rust can lead to a lower Euro NCAP score than the vehicle previously achieved, placing occupants under significantly more risk. The Golf Mk5 fell from a five-star rating to a four-star result, although its test results weren鈥檛 significant enough to place passengers under great danger. According to Thatcham鈥檚 inspection report, parts of the Mazda鈥檚 chassis were 鈥渟everely covered by rust鈥? Thatcham鈥檚 Matthew Avery said previous studies show rust isn鈥檛 a big issue on used cars in the UK, but the test highlights the need for spot checks. Interested to learn more about Thatcham?





All Jettas come with an efficient 1.4-liter turbocharged four-cylinder engine rated at 147 horsepower matched to a modern eight-speed automatic transmission. Base S models do come with a six-speed manual, though we anticipate most buyers will opt for the automatic. As a group, Jettas are comfortable and reasonably engaging to drive, though they no longer stand head and shoulders above the competition the way the previous-generation Jettas did. We blame the torsion-beam rear suspension for that, although it's rumored that an upcoming GLI model will feature a sportier independent rear suspension. Volkswagen has simplified the Jetta lineup by reducing the number of available options; equipment is now largely determined by trim level. The S model takes up the price leader end of the spectrum, while the R-Line gives the Jetta a more aggressive look. The SE is a good middle-of-the-roader, and the SEL is the luxury version of the Jetta, with the top-line SEL Premium offering luxury-sedan amenities at compact-car prices.





Which is the best one to buy? Edmunds can help you find the perfect 2019 Volkswagen Jetta. The 2019 Volkswagen Jetta is offered in the following submodels: Jetta Sedan. What do people think of the 2019 Volkswagen Jetta? Consumer ratings and reviews are also available for the 2019 Volkswagen Jetta and all its trim types. Overall, Edmunds users rate the 2019 Jetta 4 on a scale of 1 to 5 stars. Edmunds consumer reviews allow users to sift through aggregated consumer reviews to understand what other drivers are saying about any vehicle in our database. Detailed rating breakdowns (including performance, comfort, value, interior, exterior design, build quality, and reliability) are available as well to provide shoppers with a comprehensive understanding of why customers like the 2019 Jetta. Edmunds experts have compiled a robust series of ratings and reviews for the 2019 Volkswagen Jetta and all model years in our database.





Our rich content includes expert reviews and recommendations for the 2019 Jetta featuring deep dives into trim levels and features, performance, mpg, safety, interior, and driving. Edmunds also offers expert ratings, road test and performance data, long-term road tests, first-drive reviews, video reviews and more. This review was written by a member of Edmunds' editorial team of expert car reviewers. Our team drives every car you can buy. We put the vehicles through rigorous testing, evaluating how they drive and comparing them in detail to their competitors. We're also regular people like you, so we pay attention to all the different ways people use their cars every day. We want to know if there's enough room for our families and our weekend gear and whether or not our favorite drink fits in the cupholder. Our editors want to help you make the best decision on a car that fits your life. What's a good price for a New 2019 Volkswagen Jetta? 1,033 below the manufacturer鈥檚 MSRP.





1,033 by getting upfront special offers. The average savings for the 2019 Volkswagen Jetta 1.4T SEL 4dr Sedan (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 8A) is4% below the MSRP. We are showing 33 2019 Volkswagen Jetta 1.4T SEL 4dr Sedan (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 8A) vehicle(s) available in the in the Ontario area. 918 below the manufacturer鈥檚 MSRP. 918 by getting upfront special offers. The average savings for the 2019 Volkswagen Jetta 1.4T R-Line 4dr Sedan (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 8A) is3.8% below the MSRP. We are showing 44 2019 Volkswagen Jetta 1.4T R-Line 4dr Sedan (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 8A) vehicle(s) available in the in the Ontario area. 758 below the manufacturer鈥檚 MSRP. 758 by getting upfront special offers. The average savings for the 2019 Volkswagen Jetta 1.4T S 4dr Sedan (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 8A) is3.7% below the MSRP. We are showing 142 2019 Volkswagen Jetta 1.4T S 4dr Sedan (1.4L 4cyl Turbo 8A) vehicle(s) available in the in the Ontario area. 756 below the manufacturer鈥檚 MSRP. 756 by getting upfront special offers.

Saturday, July 4, 2020

Glendal's Favorite Reviews

Glendal's Favorite Reviews





Pretty much every big player in the supermini segment now offers a mild but sporty take on its wares, and Nissan is the latest brand to enter the fray. Step forward the new Nissan Micra N-Sport, a car designed to give the small car鈥檚 safe image a bit of a rebellious streak; a new model intended to showcase some much needed updates for the rest of the Micra range. It slots in above the mid-grade Acenta version, boasting an similar selection of standard equipment - save for the addition of a reversing camera, rear parking sensors and folding, heated door mirrors. Sporty touches include black 17-inch alloy wheels, black exterior detailing, a chrome exhaust tip, plus Alcantara on the dashboard and seats. Elsewhere, the boosty, blowy 0.9-litre Renault-sourced three-cylinder engine is gone, and a new 1.0-litre turbocharged triple developed for use across the entire Renault-Nissan-Mitsubishi alliance takes its place. It gets 99bhp in its most basic guise, but there鈥檚 also a 115bhp version of the new motor, which we鈥檙e trying here for the first time.





Cars fitted with this engine also get sharper steering and revised suspension for the updated Micra, which Nissan claims takes the N-Sport into 鈥榳arm hatch鈥?territory. Take that with a pinch of salt, however. Rivals like the Volkswagen Polo and Ford Fiesta have been pushing out this kind of power for years, while many offer proper hot hatchbacks with almost twice that figure. The smoking gun is that you don鈥檛 have to opt for the N-Sport model to get this higher-power unit; it鈥檚 available in the cheaper Acenta or technology-laden range-topping Tekna models, too. This engine is a real improvement on what was offered up before, both in 99bhp and 115bhp states of tune. The extra power means that the Micra finally has the grunt to take on TSI-engined versions of the Polo, Skoda Fabia and SEAT Ibiza, plus the benchmark EcoBoost set-up found in the Fiesta. The Micra鈥檚 flagship engine serves up a maximum 200Nm torque on overboost.





That means it鈥檚 good for 0-62mph in 9.9 seconds and a top speed of 121mph, which coincidentally are the exact same numbers quoted by the 123bhp Fiesta. In truth, the Nissan doesn鈥檛 deliver these figures in the same sharp manner as the Ford. The Micra could be more responsive, a bit less wheezy as you push on, and the new six-speed manual gearbox could feel a bit tighter. But it鈥檚 an engine that puts the revised supermini very much on the same page as the strongly favoured Fiesta. The 10mm lower and stiffer suspension and steering upgrades included on the 115bhp car are another tick in the box. The Micra can鈥檛 quite match the Fiesta for fun, and the Polo is more cosseting around town. But in this spec, the Micra finds a safe spot somewhere in between. The steering remains a little slack, but underneath there鈥檚 definitely an extra shade of composure on twistier roads.





It鈥檚 impressively refined at motorway cruising speeds, too. Fuel economy is quoted at 47.9mpg under WLTP rules, and while we鈥檙e still waiting for rivals to be updated to the new, more stringent standard, we suspect that to be a competitive figure. Elsewhere, the Micra gets a new infotainment unit as part of this early-life update. It鈥檚 still not the sharpest system in the business, but a welcome upgrade nonetheless. The seven-inch unit mounted in the middle of the dashboard is slightly more responsive than before, and the search function has been streamlined. There鈥檚 a new dedicated smartphone app, and voice recognition appears, too. Apple CarPlay and Android Auto are standard on all but the base Visia grade car. Inside, the Micra remains a fairly proportioned thing, though headroom is clipped a little by the low roofline. A 300-litre boot is strong though, and eclipses most rivals - even beating the latest Mazda 3, which sits in the class above. As for the cost, the N-Sport鈥檚 拢19,005 list price offers up no real incentive over the similarly powered Volkswagen Polo R-Line, while a Fiesta ST-Line EcoBoost 125 is ever so slightly less. Furthermore, like most mid-spec sporting superminis, it strays dangerously close to the starting price of full-fat hot hatchbacks like the Fiesta ST. To sweeten the deal, Nissan is offering zero per cent interest on monthly PCP deals, however. Given that the chassis tweaks are linked to the 115bhp engine and not the trim, you could save more money and still bag the best driving Micra by opting for this setup in better value Acenta trim. It鈥檚 拢1,700 less, but you鈥檒l have to forego the sporty styling touches.





The 4 Series was updated for the 2018 model, and changes for 2019 are minimal. Navigation now comes standard (previously it was optional), as do parking sensors and a one-year subscription to Apple CarPlay. Notable options include adaptive headlights, an adaptive sport suspension, premium leather upholstery, heated front seats, a surround-view camera system, and a wireless device charging pad. Additional safety features and driver aids include blind-spot monitoring, forward collision warning, low-speed automatic emergency braking, lane departure warning, and adaptive cruise control. In terms of price, the 2019 BMW 4 Series marches alongside the Mercedes C-Class and the Audi A5 or S5 when equipped similarly. The newer Mercedes leans a bit more to the traditional luxury side, while the Audi pushes modernity and technology to new levels. In many ways the BMW finds a pleasant middle ground and, despite its age handicap, is still worth serious consideration. When it's time to find your perfect 4 Series, let Edmunds help.

Thursday, June 4, 2020

Glendal's Favorite Reviews

Glendal's Favorite Reviews





Over the years the Mercedes A-Class has morphed from what was an innovative rethink on the small MPV to a gawky also-ran, before a total redesign in 2012 turned it into a thoroughly competitive premium family hatchback. Now Mercedes has had another innovative rethink with the fourth-generation A-Class. The latest version takes its design inspiration from the firm鈥檚 new, high-end models such as the CLS, while the interior promises to offer a level of tech and quality pretty much unseen before in this sector. But this area of the market is packed with premium rivals that have proven their ability time and again. First up is the Volkswagen Golf, which has become the benchmark in this class over decades of evolution. In its current Mk7.5 form it delivers space, economy, quality and a great level of technology. Mercedes does battle across the board with Audi, and on paper that brand鈥檚 A3 Sportback is a package with which the A-Class is closely aligned and will have to beat. Solid driving dynamics and cool tech mean the Audi provides a stern test.





However, our winner will have to blend a long list of attributes, while the financial factor will also come into it. So let鈥檚 find out which car is the strongest offering. As is the way with the latest car in any class, there鈥檚 lots of new tech for this 2018 Mercedes A-Class. We鈥檙e testing the A 200 petrol in AMG Line trim, which starts at a fairly pricey 拢28,700 - but its rivals cost similar money, too, so can it beat them? The A-Class鈥檚 downsized engine boasts more power than its VW Group rivals, and on test it asserted its authority, taking the car from 0-60mph in 7.4 seconds, which was four tenths faster than the Volkswagen and the Audi. The power advantage came to the fore once more during our in-gear assessments, where the A 200 just shaded its competitors in most of the tests. However, it was not by a such a margin that the A-Class had a discernable advantage on the road.





But the engine does feel more strained than the 1.5 turbo units in its rivals, which is partly due to the drone it makes under load. The power delivery has a few noticeable steps lower down in the rev range, too, and isn鈥檛 as smooth as either the VW or Audi. That is also true of the ride. It鈥檚 not the most forgiving at low speed and despite that more sophisticated multi-link rear axle, the A-Class struggles to cope with faster, harsher imperfections, jiggling the body and, consequently, the occupants around inside. Things smooth out at higher speed and the Mercedes deals with rolling road surfaces well, but a big, jagged bump will still clatter up through the suspension. There鈥檚 a good degree of composure, though, and while the car feels benign it does inspire enough confidence thanks to its stability. Testers鈥?notes: All A-Classes have lowered sports suspension, so if you鈥檙e after more ride comfort than dynamic handling, think about the trim you choose.





In every sense the Volkswagen Golf is the car the A-Class has to beat. It鈥檚 our current favourite family hatchback and blends premium appeal with practicality and technology. At 拢26,980, this 1.5 TSI EVO DSG model in R-Line trim is the cheapest here. The powertrain is a known quantity, and at our test track it performed well, with a smooth swell of torque low down (250Nm to match the Mercedes, but produced lower down from 1,500rpm) that delivered decent acceleration. The transmission makes up for a slight lack of performance, too. With the powertrain shared with the A3, the VW and Audi鈥檚 dual-clutch boxes are more accomplished than the Mercedes鈥? They shift quicker in manual mode and are slightly smoother in auto, too. Thanks to our car鈥檚 拢850 Dynamic Chassis Control adaptive dampers, the Golf鈥檚 damping is as pliant and plush as ever, even on 拢500 optional 18-inch alloys. The larger wheels mean it thumps over potholes a little more, but the damping is still more forgiving at low speed than in the A-Class.





At higher speeds on country roads those larger wheels and lower-profile tyres help, because the Golf delivers all the agility you could realistically want from a family hatch. But this doesn鈥檛 compromise ride quality or refinement, either. There鈥檚 a good level of grip to match the Mercedes, while the steering is similarly lifeless, but slightly more precise. Along with the ride, it鈥檚 a little more refined, too. The engine doesn鈥檛 sound particularly pleasant, but it doesn鈥檛 have the A-Class鈥檚 strained note, either, while wind and road noise are well suppressed. Testers鈥?notes: While the interior isn鈥檛 as modern as the A-Class鈥檚, the Golf鈥檚 ergonomics are sound and everything is constructed from high-quality materials that easily match the Mercedes鈥? With a similar mechanical make-up to the VW, the Audi A3 is another premium hatch. It appeared before the Mk7 Golf, showcasing some clever tech. It鈥檚 had some revisions over its six-year life, too, but is it still competitive in this class? To find out, we test a 拢28,835 1.5 TFSI S tronic in S line trim. Unlike the Golf, our A3 didn鈥檛 have adaptive dampers, and on 拢325 18-inch alloys the ride feels crashier than the VW鈥檚.

Wednesday, April 8, 2020

Glendal's Favorite Reviews

Glendal's Favorite Reviews





This means the car is now square in the sights of the hot hatch that鈥檚 left a trail of fast family five-doors in its wake: the Ford Focus RS. Both models use four-cylinder turbos and six-speed manual gearboxes, making them two of the most overtly sporty cars on sale today; just look at their muscular styling and aggressive stances. There鈥檚 only 拢730 difference between these two challengers鈥?list prices, too. However, one major point divides them: while the newcomer from Honda is front-wheel drive, the Ford is four-wheel drive. These cars cater for the same market and offer hardcore driving thrills alongside enough practicality to make them usable day-to-day propositions. But which has the broader range of ability to take the honours as our hot-hatch champion? The previous Civic Type R was on sale for only two years before Honda went back to the drawing board and came up with this new, ultra-hot version of the 10th-generation Civic.





The latest car comes in two flavours: standard and the 拢32,995 GT we鈥檙e testing here, which gets more equipment. VTEC works alongside the turbo here to boost low-end performance, and there鈥檚 plenty of muscle on offer. While the 400Nm of torque is some way down on the Ford鈥檚 470Nm on overboost, the Civic weighs only 1,380kg next to the 1,524kg Focus RS. Despite a limited-slip diff, the Type R struggles for traction off the line, covering 0-60mph in six seconds flat on test. But this was still a second slower than the more powerful, four-wheel-drive Ford, which has launch control to manage slip from a standstill. The cars are much more evenly matched once the wheels are turning, however. On test, 30-70mph took 4.3 seconds in both models, and the Honda was two-tenths faster from 30-50mph in third gear than the Ford, taking only 2.2 seconds. The Civic also hit the rev limiter in second just before 60mph, so the figures don鈥檛 tell the whole story. In-gear performance is exhilarating, with a wonderful blast of torque through the mid-range that gives a greater sensation of speed than the Ford鈥檚 more linear power delivery.





Where the Honda really takes off is with its breadth of ability. R on track. Both of these settings sharpen up the Honda into something truly special; the steering is precise and there鈥檚 an incredible amount of grip through bends. While the Ford is great fun, mastering the Civic鈥檚 razor-sharp chassis will engage and delight drivers even more. Fast Hondas are also known for their gearchange action, and this one is no exception to the rule. It has a short, mechanical shift, with a superb position in the cabin that adds a sense of fun to any journey. Testers鈥?notes: 鈥淵ou wouldn鈥檛 call the Civic attractive, but its pugnacious stance is backed up by a genuinely brilliant drive. The Ford Focus RS boasts more power than the Honda and is slightly cheaper, but how a car feels and how usable it is can be as important as outright firepower with models such as these. So does the 拢32,265 Focus RS have what it takes to overcome the Civic Type R鈥檚 challenge? That overboost function allows the Focus to boast brawnier figures than the Civic.





But the extra weight means that, in reality, on the road there鈥檚 not much difference in performance. At our track the launch control and four-wheel drive meant the Ford was quicker off the line from 0-60mph, taking 5.0 seconds. This was untouchable for the Honda, yet there鈥檚 more to this battle than straight-line speed. The extra torque gives the Focus strong in-gear performance, accelerating on test from 50 to 70mph in sixth in 4.6 seconds - 1.2 seconds faster than the Civic. In fifth, the same test took the Ford 3.7 seconds and the Honda 3.8 seconds, just a tenth behind. The Focus was much faster off the line, though, thanks to that four-wheel-drive grip. Despite the RS鈥檚 speed, the Civic is the sweeter car to drive, with nicer steering and incredible grip in fast corners. The Ford鈥檚 six-speed manual box is also lighter and not quite as mechanically precise as the Honda鈥檚.





It鈥檚 this interaction with the car that defines the experience. The clever Drift mode kicks the tail out into an arc in corners and gives the Ford an advantage over the Honda here, but it feels like it鈥檚 fighting what the car fundamentally wants to do. You鈥檒l have to find yourself a track just to use it. Still, the traction on offer is excellent, helping turn the car a little more from the rear and boosting agility. The RS is always raring to go. It鈥檚 firm in the standard mode, with hyper-alert steering, while initiating the RS mode for the dampers will have you pogoing up and down in your seat; the chassis is very firm. There is no doubt this hatch has the hot element covered, but it doesn鈥檛 have the breadth of ability of the Civic. Testers鈥?notes: 鈥淭he RS was developed with help from rally driver and YouTube sensation Ken Block. The Focus RS is even more pumped up than its ST stablemate, with its huge grille and roof spoiler.

ID.7: A longer-wheelbase electric sedan with impressive range, possibly for North America.

The latest confirmed information shows that the Volkswagen ID.7 will not be coming to North America at all—VW has officially cancelled its ...