DETROIT (AP) 鈥?Volkswagen almost inevitably will have to compensate owners of diesel cars equipped with emissions-rigging software. Some legal experts say the automaker could be forced to buy back the cars altogether. In September, Volkswagen admitted to rigging emissions tests in the U.S. Earlier this month, Michael Horn, the head of its U.S. VW was considering compensating owners for the lost value of their cars. He also said that it could take from one to two years to fix all the affected cars. FILE - This Oct. 5, 2015 file photo shows the Volkswagen logo at the building of a company retailer in Berlin, Germany. Volkswagen almost inevitably will have to compensate owners of diesel cars equipped with emissions-rigging software. Some legal experts say the automaker could be forced to buy back the cars altogether. Seattle lawyer Steve Berman seized on that time frame when he sued VW last week in Los Angeles, seeking full restitution for owners of nearly 70,000 affected cars in California. In a somewhat unique approach, Berman is seeking to get his clients their money back under California laws requiring automakers to guarantee emissions control parts for up to seven years or 70,000 miles.
The Environmental Protection Agency has said the VW diesels emit 10 times to 40 times the legal limit of nitrogen oxide. The plaintiffs make the case that the cars can't be driven legally since they violate pollution standards, says University of Southern California law professor Greg Keating, who specializes in consumer fraud cases. Even though the EPA says the cars can legally stay on the roads, eventually states with pollution tests will force owners to comply with the law, he says. While Berman's lawsuit covers only cars in California, the consumer fraud argument could be made successfully nationwide, according to Keating. He and Erik Gordon, a business professor and lawyer at the University of Michigan, say the argument for a buyback is a good way to start settlement talks. Gordon says the first option for judges would be to make VW pay buyers the difference between the value of the cars without the cheating software and what they are now worth.
That could be hard to calculate. Lawyers also could argue that buyers based their purchase on VW's promises of clean, peppy cars, and because the repairs will hurt performance, VW must buy the cars back, he says. Most likely, Volkswagen will settle by paying customers to avoid a drawn-out process that keeps the scandal in the news, he says. Gordon says. As the cars get older, a buyback order is less likely because the owners got considerable use out of them, he adds. Volkswagen wouldn't comment on pending lawsuits. Product buybacks are rare, but not unheard of. In a July agreement with the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration, Fiat Chrysler agreed to make buyback offers to owners of more than 500,000 Ram pickup trucks and other vehicles. The Rams have defective steering parts, and some previous repair attempts failed. Last month, Volkswagen admitted that 482,000 cars in the U.S. 2009 to 2015 model years have software that programs them to cheat on emissions tests. It later acknowledged that the same software was on 11 million cars worldwide.
21,474 for a 2015 Passat, according to Kelley Blue Book. 6.9 billion to repurchase the cars. 7.3 billion that VW has set aside for the emissions scandal. Some owners might forgo a buyback. Under California law, they have the option of getting a replacement vehicle. Horn said whatever solution VW comes up with could require a compromise from car owners. He said the EPA mileage estimates probably wouldn't change, but the fix could hurt the cars' performance. Attorneys now are vying to lead the cases, which can become very lucrative for lawyers. Lawyers usually get about 30 percent of class-action settlements. FILE - In this Sept. 23, 2015 file photo, Volkswagen diesel cars are parked in a storage lot near a VW dealership in Salt Lake City. Volkswagen almost inevitably will have to compensate owners of diesel cars equipped with emissions-rigging software. Some legal experts say the automaker could be forced to buy back the cars altogether.
